Community News

A Tale of Two Schools: Colebrook and Norfolk

Alarmed by drastically declining enrollments in their two elementary schools, the first selectmen in Norfolk and Colebrook have again raised the topic of consolidation. Last week, we looked at the reasons they advocate for some kind of cooperative arrangement between the towns. This week, the educators respond.

School administrators in Colebrook and Norfolk have differing views about the future of their institutions. Both schools have far fewer students than in previous decades, but Colebrook is happy with its educational direction, while Norfolk is looking for solutions to small class sizes and the challenges of providing enrichment on a limited budget.

In Norfolk, the 2024 graduating class had only four members, the same number as this year’s fifth grade. In Colebrook, class sizes are very slightly more robust—no class has fewer than six students. Colebrook currently has 64 students enrolled in pre-K through grade 6, while Norfolk has 59.

But Colebrook, which has committed to maintaining one teacher for each grade, has consistently scored higher in standardized testing than Norfolk, where a multi-age classroom model requires only four regular classroom teachers. 

Colebrook Consolidated Superintendent Robert Gilbert believes that not having a range of ages and skill levels in a classroom gives students an advantage. “Teaching is challenging enough with one grade,” he said.

Botelle Superintendent Mary Beth Iacobelli argues that multi-age classrooms provide students with a better social milieu. “In a larger group, [a child] is more likely to find a peer with similar interests,” she said, “and they can work together with others of the same learning level.”

Both school superintendents agree that classes can be too small and both towns have engaged in sporadic talks since the 1990s to discuss some kind or merger. In 2015, the most recent effort ended with an emphatic rejection by Colebrook of a proposal to send its children to Botelle.

Iacobelli reports that since then overtures have been made to Colebrook, “but Colebrook does not want anything to do with sending their kids to Norfolk.”

“Colebrook is happy where it is,” confirmed Colebrook school board chair Sarah Robichaud. 

The two towns do share some programs and teachers for special subjects such as art and music. Field trips and cultural events are also sometimes shared.

Gilbert does not favor consolidation. He said the school board hopes to attract tuition students to solve the paucity of enrollment.  “If Norfolk wants to pay tuition to send its kids here, we’re happy to have them,” he said.

But both Iacobelli and Norfolk school board chairman Virginia Coleman-Prisco see a problem. “What if we signed a contract with them and then things changed?” asked Coleman-Prisco. “What if they couldn’t take our kids any more or we have a special needs child that needs an expensive program, and they don’t want to take [him/her]?”

Coleman-Prisco said, “As chairman of the school board, I must take into consideration what is good for the town. It’s a complex issue that needs data and research. It impacts the town, the students and their families. 

“But, speaking personally, if a town does not have a school, it is like not having a library or a post office. If you don’t have [amenities] there are plenty of towns that do where families can buy homes.” 

Jonathan Costa, the consultant who worked with the towns on the unsuccessful 2015 merger, suggested informally that each town keep its school, but send combined grades pre-K to 3 to one school and grades 4 to 6 to the other.

“Both towns would have their schools, but class sizes would increase,” Iacobelli said. “We thought it was very exciting, but Colebrook said they don’t want to send any kids to Norfolk.”

Colebrook’s Robichaud confirmed this, saying she did not see many benefits to the proposal.

Next week, we look at how parents feel about any attempted consolidation.

Newsletter Editor

Three Events Honor Norfolk Veterans Nov. 11

Three events will highlight Veterans Day on Monday, November 11. The day starts with an 8:00 a.m. veterans’breakfast and ceremony at Northwestern Regional School # 7, where Norfolk students attend middle and high school. Veterans planning to attend should reply to 860-379-8525, ext. 2100

The Regional 7 event will be followed at 10:30 by a program at Botelle Elementary School commemorating the sacrifices made by veterans in all wars. The children sent veterans and their families hand-written invitations to the assembly. After the program, the PTO will provide luncheon for the veterans, their families and some students. 

Then, at 4:00 p.m., townspeople are invited to gather at the intersection of routes 44 and 272 for a relighting of the 1921 war memorial, which honors the valor of the town’s World War I veterans. The lighting ceremony culminates a three-year restoration of the monument initiated by the Norfolk Community Association.

It had been hoped that the monument would be rededicated on its 100th anniversary, November 11, 2021, but work was delayed by Covid and its after effects. 

NCA member Barry Webber said the monument is being professionally lit by the same company that designed lighting for the library and town hall. “There were lights on it before, but they were pretty basic and didn’t accent the structure,” he said.

The new lights will conform to current standards and will not contribute to light pollution, he said. The eight evergreens on Memorial Green, which commemorate the eight Norfolk natives who died in the First World War, will be lighted at the same time.

Webber could not give an exact cost of restoring the memorial, saying it is included with the work done on the Eldridge fountain on the village green. 

Newsletter Editor

Fire House Committee Keeps on Trimming

The Fire House Committee continued trimming the proposal for the new facility on Shepard Road Wednesday evening when it met with James Nall, an architect with Silver Petrucelli.

Substantial reductions have been made to the early estimate of $9.3 million. For instance, a three-bay utility shed at the rear of the firehouse will now be a prefabricated Morton building, reducing its cost by about half.  

“We’re trimming constantly, taking things out to get the cost down,” said First Selectman Matt Riiska.

Similarly, the hose-drying tower has been reduced in height to 26 feet, its windows have been removed and a ventilation system substituted. Nall told the committee that 26 feet will be sufficient for drying hose, but that the space beneath the peaked roof can also be employed if the firefighters want more height.

The interior of the firehouse will now be barebones. “There is no carpeting anymore and furnishing will be something the firefighters will have to take care of, unless there is money left over at the end,” said Riiska. “We have cut quite a lot out. It’s very utilitarian.”

There is no estimate yet of how much the cutbacks will save.

Newsletter Editor

Evening Walk? Wear Something Reflective

A kind motorist, who recently had a close encounter of a scary kind with a dark-clothed pedestrian on a dark road, has asked us to remind walkers that drivers do not always see them in the shadows. 

As the days shorten, she suggests walkers wear something reflective—even an arm band—or carry a flashlight to alert drivers to their presence. 

Even after we set back our clocks to Eastern Standard Time next Sunday, November 3, we can soon expect darkness to descend in late afternoon, making vigilance even more critical.

Newsletter Editor

Declining School Enrollments: What’s the Answer?

This is the first of a three-part series on renewed discussions about consolidating the Norfolk and Colebrook elementary schools.

Since August, Norfolk and Colebrook’s first selectmen have renewed talks about consolidating the two communities’ elementary schools. Colebrook now services just 64 students and Norfolk’s Botelle Elementary, 59

When Colebrook First Selectman Brad Bremer served on the Board of Education 15 years ago, Colebrook had 125 students and Norfolk had 175, he reported. That would have created a combined enrollment of about 300 students. Now it would be 120. “That makes conversations imperative,” Bremer said.

Norfolk’s first selectman, Matt Riiska, who kicked off the current round of discussion with his August column in Norfolk Now, sees the situation as urgent, and not just financially. “We are doing a huge disservice to Norfolk kids,” he said. “We are doing the minimum we can educationally. The Board of Education doesn’t raise its budget, which is fine financially, but that’s not good enough. We need to think out of the box to see what we can do to provide the best education, socialization and diversity for the kids. Something has to be done.”

It is not the first time that some kind of cooperative arrangement has been discussed by the towns and, indeed, there are some mutual agreements already in place. But regionalization has been a hot-button issue through the years.

In the 1990s Region 7 member towns studied, developed and rejected a plan to combine grades pre-K to 12. The plan would have reduced layers of administration and have provided a coordinated curriculum program. In 2011, another study was developed and rejected; it would have combined grades K through six in the region. 

The issue resurfaced in 2013 when a committee was formed to discuss regionalization or consolidation of the Colebrook and Norfolk elementary schools. Considerations covered what a consolidated board would look like, which school building would be used, what the administration would look like and how a budget would be developed for both daily operations and long-term capital improvements. That consolidation effort was voted down in 2015. 

The situation has only worsened in the decade since with actual enrollments falling significantly short of theprojected 2024 enrollments of 84 students in Norfolk and 78 students in Colebrook.

“I felt even when there were 125 students that, socially, the students would have benefitted from larger class sizes,” said Bremer. 

For his part, Riiska sees three possibilities: 

First, that the two boards of education could reach a cooperative agreement that would not require a public vote, which he said state statute allows. Second, that the towns vote to regionalize or consolidate. And third, that grades pre-k through 12 be folded into Regional School District # 7, with the Region 7 Board of Education as the governing body for the high school, middle school and elementary schools.

The two selectmen have committed to talk and explore possibilities but, as Bremer said, “It will take hard work and open minds.”

Next week, we will look at educators’ responses to the renewed discussion.

Newsletter Editor

Why Can’t DOT Use Its Own Data to Okay Bridge?

First Selectman Matt Riiska is perplexed. Why, he asks, if the firm designing the permanent replacement of Smith Road bridge for the state DOT has given him the data he has used to apply for DEEP and Army Corps of Engineers approval of a temporary structure, can’t the DOT use the same information to get approval for its bridge? 

The DOT has suggested that permanent bridge construction may not start until spring 2026, but Riiska said once he sends in a more detailed plan for the temporary bridge— which he expects to do by November 1—the Army Corps has just 60 days to approve or disapprove the plan. 

If the Corps demands a hydrology report, that would extend the timeline.

Riiska will continue to work toward building a temporary bridge but will simultaneously contact the DOT to see why work on the permanent span cannot begin next spring. 

“I want to move this along to the point where they can put shovels in the ground,” he said. “They already have a design, they did the test borings months ago, so they know what the ground is like underneath. What are they waiting for? They should be able to complete the design and get it out for bid soon.”

If the permanent work can be done by next spring or summer, Riiska said he will won’t spend $150,000 of the town’s money on a temporary bridge.

Newsletter Editor

Voters were eager to cast early ballots

Residents lined up early to sign in for early voting Monday, the first day they could cast ballots in the upcoming presidential election.

Democratic Registrar of Voters Danese Perron said that she was struggling to get her computer ready at 8:00 a.m. Monday and looked up to find a line already forming. “Turn-out was pretty consistent all day,” she said. 

Monday brought the most voters—65 electors, followed by 38 on Tuesday, 22 on Wednesday and 17 by 2:00 p.m. on Thursday. Three persons availed themselves of same-day registration.

Early voting continues upstairs in Town Hall each day from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. through Monday, October 28, including Saturday and Sunday. Polls are open Tuesday, October 29, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.; Wednesday, October 30, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; Thursday, October 31, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., and Friday, Saturday and Sunday, November 1, 2 and 3, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

On Election Day, November 5, voting will be from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Newsletter Editor

Veterans Day Breakfast

The Northwestern Regional School District #7 will host a Veterans Day Breakfast on Monday, November 11, 2024 at 8:00 at Northwestern Regional School. Breakfast will be served from 8:00 to 9:00 a.m., followed by a program in the auditorium.

Veterans planning to attend should RSVP to 860-379-8525, ext. 2100.

Conservation Commission To Tackle Buckthorn

The Norfolk Conservation Commission will hold a community volunteer event Sunday, October 27th, at 11 a.m. 

Work will focus on eliminating the young buckthorn sprouting at the entrance to Barbour Woods and bordering the Land Trust’s newly acquired Borden Woods along Lovers Lane. There will be a brief orientation to buckthorn and control strategies. 

The Conservation Commission is looking for suggestions for upcoming events and hopes to recruit volunteers to help manage Norfolk’s many invasive plants. Keep track of events at its Facebook page and send suggestions to conservationcommission@norfolkct.org.

Newsletter Editor

Moose on the Mountain: GMF Studies Their Impact

For more than a century, Great Mountain Forest has served as a laboratory for forest science. The focus has been on trees, but now a new element—the moose—is under its metaphorical microscope.

Moose, usually denizens of northern forests, were unexpectedly detected in the forest in 2002, even though Connecticut is on the southern fringe of moose habitat. Eight years later, research into the effects they were having on the forest was initiated and in 2020, a second study was begun to determine their population.

Deploying game cameras at known foraging spots, Great Mountain Forest has identified 21 animals: 11 mature bulls, two adolescent bulls, five cows and three calves. This accounts for about one-quarter of the moose in Connecticut, according to DEEP estimates.

Although moose are breeding in the forest, anecdotal reports suggest their population is decreasing. Climate change is one factor that allows ticks to remain active in winter, continuing to prey on and weaken the animals.

Another factor limiting population growth is less area that attracts moose. The animals are drawn to areas where trees have been cut down, allowing younger trees to grow. As moose prefer to browse at head height, they look for trees roughly four to eight inches in diameter. Moose can walk over these young trees, bending their trunks and browsing on the upper branches. 

While the moose population has been resident at GMF, scientists have taken the opportunity to compare their impact on forest development to that of white-tailed deer. In 2010, researchers Ed Faison, senior ecologist at Highstead Foundation, and Steve DeStefano, retired leader of the Massachusetts Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, began collaborating with Great Mountain Forest to set up experimental moose and deer exclusion plots.

Each plot was fenced in different ways to dictate which species could access its vegetation. Comparing the trees, shrubs and other plants in the plots is allowing researchers to study how selective foraging patterns affect the forest.

According to Faison, the browsing effects of deer alone on the forest have been minor and often not much different from the plot where browsers have been completely excluded. The effects by moose and deer combined have been large and point to moose being the dominant browser in these harvested areas.

Here are some of the strongest patterns :

  • Moose and deer together have reduced the number of trees less than 1 inch by about 30 percent.
  • By creating a more open forest, moose and deer together have increased the number of trees that have grown larger than 5 inches in diameter. In the herbivore exclusion and deer browsing plots, none of the more densely packed trees have grown above 5 inches in diameter. This increase in large trees has resulted in a greater tree size diversity in the area browsed by both moose and deer relative to the other plots.
  • By browsing deciduous tree species and avoiding white pine, moose plus deer have increased the abundance of pine. Pine comprises almost half the tree area in the moose and deer plot compared to only one-sixth to one-eighth of the tree area in the other plots where deciduous species are more abundant.
  • Moose plus deer browsing has greatly reduced the abundance of early successional (aka pioneer) tree species such as pin cherry, gray birch and paper birch. These fast-growing tree species are particularly susceptible to browsing because they are shade intolerant and, once they are reduced in height by browsing, they tend to die out under the shade of other trees.

Newsletter Editor